A ZNN MID-SUMMER EDITORIAL - THE UAP MATTER - WHAT NEXT?

August 20, 2022

Where have we been? 

Where are we now? 

What Next?

A ZlandCommunications Editorial

__________________________________

The title of this editorial suggests an array of possibilities and questions 

none of which are totally answerable - 

however it is necessary that they be posed.

 

“Curiosity and irreverence go together. To the questioner, nothing is sacred." 

Saul D. Alinsky

__________________________________

Since its inception in 2010, the ZlandCommunications NewsNetwork continues to provide a journalistic perspective related to the evolving movement and process of UAP/ET Disclosure. 

This perspective is different. 

It serves to capture not only a Canadian journalistic point-of-view but one that attempts to engage a wider, more global sociological narrative that is contrastive to the mainstream news diet of: 

• Cyclical geo-political war, 
• On-going international strife,
• The corporate film industry's dominant need to demonize the Extraterrestrial Presence now engaging the planet, and,
• A stridently divisive American mainstream news ideology that reports on - but is non-responsive to the demise of the US Constitution. 

These caustic news cycles dominate our consciousness. While sucking the oxygen out of the room occupied by responsible journalism and common sense, many in the general public flail among the poisonous weeds cultivated by the likes of Alex Jones, Donald tRump, Vladimir Putin and others of severely diminished mental capacity. The resulting news vacuum serves to subvert if not entirely annihilate any meaningful narrative related to the evolving movement and process of UAP/ET disclosure. 

This continues to be a problem.

WHERE HAVE WE BEEN?

Historically, since the mid 1950's the international UAP/UFO research community has been immersed in both the revelatory and the ridiculous. The knowledgeable reader will know what is being referred to here - so we won't dwell on it.

To journalists who continue to turn a blind eye to the far-reaching implications of the UAP issue, try contacting Ralph Blumenthal, Leslie Kean or Helene Cooper to find out why the NY Times chose to dismantle the wall of UAP government secrecy.

__________________________________ 

It is well worth noting that the editorial practices if not the editorial policies of the New York Times have been significantly rebooted to embrace the exposure of government secrecy. How much deeper this reboot goes remains to be seen.

__________________________________

To the uninitiated and indolent who choose to remain oblivious to this matter - regrettably, and despite our best efforts - you simply have not been paying attention. 

WHERE ARE WE NOW?

Beginning in 2017 the New York Times article penned by Ralph Blumenthal, Leslie Kean and Helene Cooper, the dam of government UAP obfuscation is now officially under demolition. 

This category of jarring and journalistic activism by these demolition artists includes and foreshadowed: 

• US Navy pilot UAP revelations, 
• Their videos, 
• Uncloaked US Pentagon UAP  investigative programs, 
• New offices of investigative programs, 
• CBS 60 Minutes UAP coverage, 
• The National Authorization Act UAP content, 
• US and Brazilian UAP Hearings. 

Nothing of this revelatory nature or impact has ever occurred before... and - it appears more is coming.

We however are remiss if we dwell on these alone. New questions need to be asked - new planetary directions need to be pursued.

WHAT COMES NEXT?

“Towards what horizon is the UAP disclosure process headed?”

What new DNA genetic material is imbedded in this issue that will codify advancements in civil and natural law to allow the human family to penetrate and understand what UAP researchers and government purveyors of secrecy have known for decades?

Will this new genetic material permit the human family to conclude that this matter is their issue?

[Just another way of saying - this matter does not belong to any government?]

What doddery language needs to be eliminated from the UAP/ET vocabulary and replaced by a new lexicon - one that re-shapes archaic scientific, political and sociological ontologies?

Might an emerging and vigorously independent film industry displace a fear-driven Hollywood motion picture machine bent on fabricating an aggressive alien agenda?

Will the U.S. Congress ever step forward to look inside the cavernous issue of UAP and an ET presence?

Finally - who will be the ultimate gatekeepers to permit these possibilities to occur?

As with most complex ideological modes of reasoning, a whirlwind of knee-jerk or transitory answers are rarely sufficient in responding to such deliberately challenging questions.

Yet good news is ahead. A world-renowned physicist has much to say about a new landing-spot for ways to discuss and understand the UAP/ET presence.

Readers are encouraged to explore the landscape of a new narrative - a new lexicon of revised modes of reasoning with his thesis published recently in the Journal of Cosmology Vol. 29:

ULTRATERRESTRIAL MODELS

Harold E. Puthoff Ph.D.

[Ed. Note: as many have come to realize after reading it, this thesis is complex. It challenges the status quo, engages new ways of thinking and above all - cracks the glass ceiling of scientific and political intransigence that denies advanced ideas at the very edge of common terrestrial reasoning.]

__________________________________